![]() |
Review Article
1 Associate Professor, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
2 MD, Integrated Cancer Registry of Oriental Sicily, Catania, Italy
3 MD, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Italy
Address correspondence to:
Rosario Caruso
Policlinico Universitario, via Consolare Valeria 1, I-98125 Messina,
Italy
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 100040Z11RC2020
Neutrophils are cell protagonists of innate immunity, frequently found in the tumor microenvironment and associated with higher tumor stage and adverse prognosis of patients, especially in hepatocellular, renal cell, pancreatic ductal, and non-small cell carcinomas. The aim of the present review is a systematic appraisal of current literature to examine the prognostic role of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) in patients operated for colorectal cancer. We analyzed 9 articles (number = 4606 patients). Although a noteworthy degree of heterogeneity was found in terms of study methodology, 8 out of 9 articles surprisingly showed an improved survival in colorectal cancers with high TAN counts. These data suggest that TANs may be favorable prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. Therefore, there is need for standardization of TAN assessment that will help in more accurately predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Prognosis, Tumor-associated neutrophils, Tumor microenvironment
Pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) staging remains the gold standard for prognostic models for oncologists, but it is mainly focused on tumor cells, neglecting the role of adaptive and innate immune system in the host stromal reaction. Neutrophils are innate immune cells that constitute 50–70% of all circulating leukocytes. A high number of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) correlate with higher tumor stage and adverse prognosis, particularly in hepatocellular, renal, pancreatic ductal, and non-small cell carcinomas [1],[2]. In our previous study on gastric carcinomas, the multivariable analysis revealed that TANs, particularly in female patients, were associated with a reduction in their risk of mortality [3]. Similar findings have been confirmed in subsequent studies [4],[5]. Therefore, we performed a review of the literature with the aim of verifying the prognostic impact of TANs in colorectal cancer. In addition, the function, identification, location, and clinical significance of TANs in colorectal cancer will be discussed.
TAN role in cancer
Neutrophils are characterized by a short life span, which makes them difficult to study in human tumors [6]. Therefore, most functional research on TANs is based on animal models of cancer [6]. Fridlender and Albelda [7] have provided experimental evidence of a bipolar pattern of TAN activation (N1/N2) similar to what has been described in macrophages (M1/M2) and T cell (Th1/Th2) polarization. Briefly, N1 neutrophils exert antitumor activity, whereas N2 neutrophils protumor activity [7]. It is possible that N1 and N2 phenotypes do not represent two distinct subpopulations of TANs but only reflect their functional state, which is regulated by molecules secreted in the tumor microenvironment. In particular, interferon beta (IFN-β) induces an antitumoral N1 phenotype, whereas transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) promotes the polarization of neutrophils into a protumoral phenotype [8],[9]. However, it is necessary to remember that N1/N2 neutrophils have been described in murine models and must be confirmed in human tumors. Therefore, we await further studies to deepen knowledge on the different functional stages of neutrophils in human tumors.
Identification of TANs
Different methods are used in the identification of TANs. Tumor-associated neutrophils were recognized by their trilobed nuclei in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of tumor stroma [10],[11]. Subsequently, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, such as myeloperoxidase, CD15, CD177, and/or CD66b, has been employed to identify TANs in a more specific manner. However, IHC results must be interpreted with caution. Galdiero et al. [12] pointed out that antibodies against myeloperoxidase highlight not only neutrophils but also monocytes and immature macrophages. CD177 is a neutrophil surface molecule that is restricted to a subset of neutrophils [13], whereas CD15 is expressed in neutrophils, eosinophils, some monocytes, and occasionally in tumor cells [12]. CD66b immunoreactivity is found both on neutrophils and eosinophils and is recognized as a granulocyte “activation marker” [14]. Therefore, we suggest that it could be useful to include a H&E stained serial section as control to establish the percentage of TANs compared to eosinophils.
TAN density
Neutrophils within areas of necrosis or in areas adjacent to ulcerations are usually not counted. Therefore, there are not information about TAN density and tumor ulceration. Tumor-associated neutrophil density may be established by a manual count, i.e., random non-overlapping high-power fields are observed at 400× magnification per slide. Alternatively, automated image analysis can be applied to evaluating TAN in histological sections. Several studies have shown that computer-based analysis provides a more reproducible assessment of the immune cell percentage than visual semiquantitative estimation [15].
Location of TANs
Tumor-associated neutrophils can be found mainly at the invasive front of a tumor (peritumoral location) or in the center of a tumor (intratumoral location). Recent studies suggest that a distinct evaluation of these two areas improved prognostic accuracy compared with single region analysis [12],[16]. Intratumoral TAN distribution shows heterogeneity, being found as a single massive infiltrate in the tumor stroma or as a series of multifocal aggregates scattered throughout the tumor stroma [3]. These data imply that TAN evaluation is more accurate on whole-tissue sections compared to tissue macroarray (TMA) technology that uses small millimeter punches from tumors with an original size of up to several centimeters in diameter [11].
Prognostic role of TANs in colorectal cancer
Uehara et al. [10] studied the clinicopathologic significance of microscopic abscess formation in advanced low rectal cancer. Microscopic abscess formation, identified by using H&E staining, contained cell debris and numerous neutrophils. It was usually found at the invasive front of the tumor and remained an independent factor in multivariate analysis, suggesting a favorable prognosis after curative resection for low rectal cancer [10]. Droeser et al. [17] showed that a subgroup of colorectal carcinomas is characterized by high TAN counts, defined as myeloperoxidase and CD15 positive cells per TMA spot. In multivariate analysis, high score myeloperoxidase was positive, but CD15 positive cell infiltration was not independently associated with favorable prognosis. In a following work, these authors further examined interaction between the innate and adaptive immune system in colorectal cancer, studying CD8 and myeloperoxidase positive cells in a TMA [18]. They identified a subgroup of colorectal cancers characterized by low count of both CD8 and myeloperoxidase tumor infiltrates with a severe prognosis. Recently, the same research group noted that myeloperoxidase positivity may be observed in different cells of myeloid lineage. Therefore, in a new study, this research group prefers CD66b IHC on TMA, a classical neutrophil marker [19]. Moreover, they clarified that >90% of CD66b colorectal cancer-infiltrating cells were neutrophils, as this IHC marker is co-expressed by neutrophils and eosinophils. Their results confirmed that CD66b cell infiltration in colorectal cancer is associated with favorable prognosis [19]. Applying CD66b IHC on TMA, Rao et al. [20] showed that a high TAN count was positively correlated with advanced clinical stage and predicted adverse prognosis. By contrast, other authors, applying CD66b IHC on whole section, described a positive correlation with prognosis. Moreover, they added new data regarding the relationship of TANs with carcinogenesis, tumor stage, and tumoral subsites. Zhou et al. [21] studied IHC expression of CD177, a marker mainly revealed in neutrophils, in colorectal tumor tissue, in healthy controls as well as in patients with ulcerative colitis and ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer. They showed that high density of CD177-positive TANs predicts favorable prognosis in colorectal cancer. Moreover, density of CD177-positive neutrophils was significantly increased in patients with ulcerative colitis and ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Their experimental data showed that depletion of CD177-positive neutrophils facilitated colorectal carcinogenesis, suggesting an important role for neutrophils in the suppression of epithelial cell carcinogenesis in colitis-associated cancer [21],[22]. Berry et al. [11] showed a variability of median TAN density between different stages with consequent different prognostic impact. In particular, they showed lowest TAN density in stage intravenous (IV) neoplasms, whereas high levels of TANs were significantly related with better prognosis in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Wikberg et al. [16] have studied the prognostic role of TANs at different tumor subsites including the invasive front, the center of the tumor, and in the tumor epithelium of 448 archival human tumor tissue samples from patients surgically resected for colorectal carcinomas. High neutrophil infiltration at the tumor front was mainly found in early stages of colorectal cancers. Moreover, low number of CD66b-positive cells in the tumor front was associated to a worse patient prognosis in stages I–II colon cancers [16]. Similarly, Galdiero et al. [12], using CD66b IHC, showed a significant decrease of TANs in stage IV patients compared to stages I–III. Moreover, at multivariable analysis, high TAN density was associated with better prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinomas (stages I–IV). Their results also demonstrated interactions between pathological stage, TAN density, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [12]. Interestingly, higher density of TAN was associated with better response to 5-FU chemotherapy in a subgroup of patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Thus, assessment of TAN density may not only be useful for prognostic information, but may also have important therapeutic implications, in particular for identifying patients likely to benefit from 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Future studies are also needed to examine the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and TANs in colorectal cancer.
Although a high number of TANs has been associated with adverse prognosis in several solid tumors, 8 out of 9 publications showed, surprisingly, improved survival in patients operated for colorectal cancer with high TANs. Table 1 summarizes main characteristics of studies regarding TANs in colorectal cancer including TAN identification, cutoff TAN count, tumor compartment, survival endpoints, and prognostic factors. These data suggest that organ-specific microenvironment may influence the antitumoral role of TANs and their favorable prognostic impact. However, these studies show heterogeneity in terms of ethnicity (Asian/Caucasian), anatomical location (colon/rectum), stages (I, I–III, I–IV), study methodology (whole sections or TMA), neutrophil identification (H&E stain/IHC; antibodies used), scoring cutoffs and survival endpoints (overall survival, disease specific survival, disease free survival). Further studies are clearly required to standardize the evaluation of TANs in these neoplasms. Standardization of these procedures will be a fundamental step in the eventual implementation of TANs in pTNM-immune staging, as has been suggested for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes into colorectal cancer pTNM staging.
1.
Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG. Neutrophils as active regulators of the immune system in the tumor microenvironment. J Leukoc Biol 2017;102(2):343–9. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Jensen HK, Donskov F, Marcussen N, Nordsmark M, Lundbeck F, von der Maase H. Presence of intratumoral neutrophils is an independent prognostic factor in localized renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(28):4709–17. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
3.
Caruso RA, Bellocco R, Pagano M, Bertoli G, Rigoli L, Inferrera C. Prognostic value of intratumoral neutrophils in advanced gastric carcinoma in a high-risk area in northern Italy. Mod Pathol 2002;15(8):831–7. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
4.
Zhang H, Liu H, Shen Z, et al. Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils is prognostic and predictive for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg 2018;267(2):311–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
5.
Clausen F, Behrens HM, Krüger S, Röcken C. Sexual dimorphism in gastric cancer: tumor-associated neutrophils predict patient outcome only for women. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020;146(1):53–66. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
6.
Shen M, Hu P, Donskov F, Wang G, Liu Q, Du J. Tumor-associated neutrophils as a new prognostic factor in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e98259. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
7.
Fridlender ZG, Albelda SM. Tumor-associated neutrophils: Friend or foe? Carcinogenesis 2012;33(5):949–55. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
8.
Andzinski L, Kasnitz N, Stahnke S, et al. Type I IFNs induce anti-tumor polarization of tumor associated neutrophils in mice and human. Int J Cancer 2016;138(8):1982–93. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
9.
Jablonska J, Leschner S, Westphal K, Lienenklaus S, Weiss S. Neutrophils responsive to endogenous IFN-beta regulate tumor angiogenesis and growth in a mouse tumor model. J Clin Invest 2010;120(4):1151–64. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
10.
Uehara K, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Taniguchi H, Akasu T, Moriya Y. Clinicopathological significance of microscopic abscess formation at the invasive margin of advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94(2):239–43. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
11.
Berry RS, Xiong MJ, Greenbaum A, et al. High levels of tumor-associated neutrophils are associated with improved overall survival in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2017;12(12):e0188799. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
12.
Galdiero MR, Bianchi P, Grizzi F, et al. Occurrence and significance of tumor-associated neutrophils in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2016;139(2):446–-56. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
13.
Sachs UJH, Andrei-Selmer CL, Maniar A, et al. The neutrophil-specific antigen CD177 is a counter-receptor for platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD31). J Biol Chem 2007;282(32):23603–12. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
14.
Ducker TP, Skubitz KM. Subcellular localization of CD66, CD67, and NCA in human neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol 1992;52(1):11–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
15.
Väyrynen JP, Vornanen JO, Sajanti S, Böhm JP, Tuomisto A, Mäkinen MJ. An improved image analysis method for cell counting lends credibility to the prognostic significance of T cells in colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch 2012;460(5):455–65. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
16.
Wikberg ML, Ling A, Li X, Öberg Å, Edin S, Palmqvist R. Neutrophil infiltration is a favorable prognostic factor in early stages of colon cancer. Hum Pathol 2017;68:193–202. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
17.
Droeser RA, Hirt C, Eppenberger-Castori S, et al. High myeloperoxidase positive cell infiltration in colorectal cancer is an independent favorable prognostic factor. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e64814. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
18.
Däster S, Eppenberger-Castori S, Hirt C, et al. Absence of myeloperoxidase and CD8 positive cells in colorectal cancer infiltrates identifies patients with severe prognosis. Oncoimmunology 2015;4(12):e1050574. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
19.
Governa V, Trella E, Mele V, et al. The interplay between neutrophils and CD8(+) T cells improves survival in human colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(14):3847–58. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
20.
Rao HL, Chen JW, Li M, et al. Increased intratumoral neutrophil in colorectal carcinomas correlates closely with malignant phenotype and predicts patients’ adverse prognosis. PLoS One 2012;7(1):e30806. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
21.
Zhou G, Peng K, Song Y, et al. CD177+ neutrophils suppress epithelial cell tumourigenesis in colitis-associated cancer and predict good prognosis in colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis 2018;39(2):272–82. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
22.
Angell HK, Bruni D, Barrett JC, Herbst R, Galon J. The immunoscore: Colon cancer and beyond. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(2):332–9. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
Rosario Caruso - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Eleonora Irato - Acquisition of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Silvana Mirella Aliberti - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Mario Capunzo - Acquisition of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Luciana Rigoli - Acquisition of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Guarantor of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2020 Rosario Caruso et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.